Index / Language / Records / Italian / Grammar
Two particles carrying meanings that neither English, Spanish nor Portuguese has a single word for. They are obligatory where the standard requires them, and their absence is an error rather than a simplification.
The control text · practical
Buongiorno. Il 12 di questo mese mi è stato addebitato un importo di 89,90 euro che non riconosco. Immagino che si tratti di un errore: ho disdetto quel servizio a maggio e ne ho conservato la ricevuta. Le chiedo di accreditarmi la somma e di confermarmi per iscritto che l'abbonamento è stato chiuso. Se non riceverò riscontro entro venerdì, presenterò un reclamo. Resto in attesa.
Where the two part
Standard · the base
Obligatory in the standard. Quante ne vuoi? cannot drop the ne; ci sono cannot drop the ci.
Regional · the contrast
Regional speech tends to overuse them rather than under-use them — ci ho fame for ho fame is widespread and outside the standard.
10 options
Quante ricevute hai? — Ne ho tre.
The tellA quantity mentioned with the thing left out. The ne carries the thing.
Obligatory: ho tre alone is ungrammatical. Once seen, it is hard to unsee.
Nothing in your other languages does this, so it has to be built rather than mapped.
Ne ho conservato la ricevuta. — Anchor A · Ne parliamo domani.
The tellReplacing a di phrase.
Anchor A contains one, so the control text demonstrates it.
It is easy to read past without noticing, which is why learners never produce it.
Sei andato in banca? — Sì, e ne sono uscito adesso.
The tellMotion away from a place already mentioned.
Completes the picture: ci is to there, ne is from there.
Lower frequency than the partitive, and easy to confuse with the di use.
Sei stato in banca? — Ci sono andato ieri.
The tellReplacing a place already named.
The most transparent use, and the easiest to start producing.
It collides with ci meaning us, and only context separates them.
Finché non ci saranno prove… — Anchor B
The tellC'è, ci sono, ci saranno. The ci is not optional and not locative.
Anchor B contains one, and this is among the highest-frequency structures in the language.
Its agreement is with the thing that exists, so ci sono and c'è are not interchangeable.
Non ci credo. · Ci penso io.
The tellReplacing an a or in phrase.
Ci penso io is one of the most useful short sentences in Italian — I will handle it.
Pensarci and pensarne mean different things, and the preposition decides which.
| Verb | Sense |
|---|---|
| volerci | to take, to be required — ci vuole tempo |
| metterci | to take, of a person — ci metto un'ora |
| entrarci | to be relevant — non c'entra |
The tellA ci that cannot be removed and does not mean there.
Volerci and metterci are everyday and not interchangeable — one is impersonal, one has a subject.
These belong to the pronominal verbs on GRM-07 as well, so the two sheets overlap deliberately.
| Verb | Sense |
|---|---|
| andarsene | to leave — me ne vado |
| fregarsene | not to care — me ne frego |
| accorgersene | to notice it |
The tellA ne welded to the verb and to a reflexive at the same time.
Me ne vado is among the most common sentences in spoken Italian.
Three elements to assemble — reflexive, ne, verb — and all three move together.
Ci ho fame · Ci hai ragione — ordinary speech, outside the standard
The tellA ci in front of avere that carries no meaning at all.
Very widespread, and recognising it prevents you from hunting for a meaning that is not there.
Wrong in writing, and the written form c'ho is worse than the spoken one.
Ho tre for ne ho tre · Sono andato for ci sono andato
The tellA sentence that is complete in Spanish or Portuguese and incomplete in Italian.
Named because this is precisely where your two source languages leave a hole: neither has these particles, so neither prompts you to produce them.
The omission is ungrammatical rather than informal, and it is the single most reliable sign of a Romance-speaking learner.