Index / Language / Records / Spanish / Grammar
Which pronoun goes where, and whether it doubles. The one domain where the Academy licenses in Spain something Latin America treats as wrong.
The control text · practical
Buenos días. El día 12 de este mes se me cargó en la cuenta un importe de 89,90 dólares que no reconozco. Imagino que se trata de un error: cancelé ese servicio en mayo y conservo el comprobante. Les agradecería que me abonaran el importe y me confirmaran por escrito que la suscripción quedó cancelada. Si no recibo respuesta antes del viernes, presentaré una reclamación. Quedo a la espera.
Where the two part
Latin American · the base
Lo and la for direct objects, le for indirect, held more strictly than in Spain. Clitic doubling with a preposed object is normal: a Juan lo vi ayer.
Peninsular · the contrast
Leísmo de persona — le vi for a man — is accepted by the Academy for masculine singular persons. Laísmo and loísmo are not, and are regionally marked within Spain.
10 options
¿Viste el comprobante? — Sí, lo tengo. · ¿La factura? — La conservo.
The tellCase matched to function, with no leísmo.
Correct in every variety including Spain, which makes it the safe choice in both exam lanes.
None — and it is why the Latin American system is the better default even for a Peninsular target.
Le agradecería… — Anchor A · Le escribí ayer.
The tellLe where the object is a recipient rather than a thing acted on.
Anchor A uses it. Universal and unambiguous.
It does not mark gender, so context has to carry it.
Le vi ayer. — a man; accepted by the Academy
The tellLe as a direct object for a masculine singular person.
Genuinely licensed rather than merely tolerated, which is unusual, and it is very common in Spain.
In Latin America it is heard as an error rather than as Peninsular, so it does not travel.
La dije la verdad · Lo dije la verdad — both non-standard
The tellLa or lo where le belongs.
On the sheet so that leísmo is not mistaken for a general licence: the Academy accepts one of these three and not the others.
Non-standard everywhere, and regionally marked inside Spain.
A Juan lo vi ayer. · El importe, lo pagué en mayo.
The tellA fronted object echoed by a clitic. Obligatory, not optional.
Universal, and it is how Spanish marks topic — the same job Italian does with dislocation.
Omitting the clitic when the object is fronted is an error rather than a simplification.
Le escribí al banco. — both the clitic and the phrase
The tellA redundant le alongside a named recipient.
Standard and expected. Omitting it sounds translated.
It looks redundant to an English or Italian eye, which is why learners drop it.
LatAm Lo voy a cancelar.
Peninsular Voy a cancelarlo.
The tellWith a periphrasis the clitic may climb or attach. Both are standard.
Genuinely free, and you can choose by rhythm.
Mixing the two in one paragraph looks unsettled — the same cost as the -se/-ra choice.
Abónenmelo. · Confírmemelo por escrito.
The tellAttached, and with two clitics the indirect comes first.
The order rule is the same as Italian's, so it transfers.
Spanish does not fuse them the way Italian does — there is no glielo here, so the transfer is partial.
Brazilian avoids third-person clitics entirely: vi ele, or nothing at all
The tellA null object or a tonic pronoun where Spanish requires a clitic.
Named because your Brazilian base makes this the likeliest structural error on the sheet: Portuguese lets you drop the object and Spanish does not.
Vi alone for lo vi is ungrammatical in Spanish, not informal.
Italian fuses clitics (glielo) and Spanish does not
The tellAn attempt to fuse where Spanish keeps them separate.
Named because the ordering rule transfers and the fusion does not, which is a partial-transfer trap.
Italian's ne and ci have no Spanish equivalent either, so the systems diverge more than they look.